If the WHT mods are paid (as far as I know, they're aren't, but I don't care if they are) change one's judgement? WHT advertisers have been banned before so clearly there isn't a conflict of interest between the two.
I truly don't care if they're paid either. I feel that the honest hard working mods there, deserve something for their hard work.
However, comparing mods with advertisers is like comparing apples to oranges.
1. Paying a mod, and then banning them, requires a little more than clicking the ban button, as they are an employee, not a volunteer.
2. There is obviously a minor double standard in most places, when it comes to their moderator team. There has to be, to an extent, as they need to retain a level of control, authority, and respect. At WHT you can see this, not everytime, but a lot of times, when someone feels the need to publicly display their distaste for iNet, WHT, or a WHT mod. The thread is removed or closed. They then urge you in private to continue the discussion in private. What if you really want everyone to know what you think?
I know discussion forums are not the domain for freedom of speech, but it tends to remind me a lot of the portion of the Patriot Act that basically says "Oh yes, you have complete freedom of speech, and can say anything you want, except...this, and this, and this, and that, and this, and this, and this, and that, and that, and this, and this, and you most certainly cannot express your distaste for the people you pay to run this country or you go to jail. You also have the right to privacy, unless we all of a sudden feel the need to let an authority figure come into your house, without cause, or warrant and invade that."