WHMCS or Clientexec

[Taylor-e2]

WHMCS all the way, we have never had any issues with WHMCS so far and it has satisfied us greatly.

 

[Virtuous_Host]

I want to try ClientExec it looks nice but right now I have WHMCS and it is a complete Solution. It would be hard to beat.

 

[ViVi]

I love WHMCS its easy to use, easy to customize, easy to learn it inside out and great features!

I've used ClientExec once.... I never went back to it.

 

[gatay]

I have been using WHMCS for over a year.
I have not seen any major bugs especially since V4 came out.
If you need any help setting it up let me know.

 

[hostwebdata]

i would go with whmcs most people here use it if im not wrong

 

[fantome2024]

I use WHMCS I haven't really noticed any bugs everything seems pretty smooth with it

 

[rebelnet]

WHMCS is now the king of the billing for web hosting companies of all sizes .. really!

 

[expertwebhost]

I use WHMCS. But, if you are in free hosting industry, you can try THT(freeware) too.

 

[Sean-Cration]

I'd say WHMCS. I've used it for just over a year and love it. Its kind of overwhelming when you go to set it up for the first time, there just seems to be so many things to configure, but its very user friendly once you get used to all the settings. Its a great piece of software, and its the only thing I'm ever going to use.

 

[allreseller.com]

whmcs is the best

Will help maintain things alot better, find a host that gives one for free with sign up

 

[Taylor-e2]

As you can see, WHMCS software is very hard to beat and is the most recommended. I'm pretty sure it's safe to say you should definitely consider purchasing a WHMCS license.

 

[9xlinux]

WHMCS is highly recommend. Easy to use both for clients and admins.

 

[DonR]

Just purchased WHMCS based on this thread.

 

[ultimahosts]

We use WHMCS and it has been very handy.

 

[SwarmHost]

Interesting thread. I have used both. I haven't used WHMCS extensively, but I do like what I have seen. Clientexec manages our clients right now, but it does frustrate me at times due to the lack of fine tuning. Actually, I was already contemplating the switch. It's great to see there are so many fans of WHMCS. I doubt I would be making the wrong decision. Thanks, Zeke

 

[sequencehosting]

I would have to go with WHMCS. Easy to use and very powerful.

 

[nightshadpro]

We tend to lean towards WHMCS. We've tried ClientExec, and other packages, and none of them seem to have the functionality and prestige that WHMCS does.

 

[vWiz]

This has been a fairly well-discussed topic over the years and most of the time, I've seen most favor WHMCS>clientexec.
I've used both, I would say WHMCS is better in many ways.

 

[AeroVPS]

WHMCS- even the administrator cp is so much more professional. I got tired of working with CE, everything is a mission to do and look for.

 

[Fastian]

WHMCS
For what it does and what it costs, I think its the best option available to hosts.