Virtuozzo or OpenVZ(HyperVM)?

[webhost.uk.com]

Hello,

We also prefer Virtuozzo its much better and secure..for quality you should pay 🙂

 

[Saurabh]

We used to use OpenVZ previously but apparently shifted to Virtuozzo on a trial basis, but I have been more than satisfied with its performance and stability hence decided to stay with it. Until recently we used to offer VPS's created using Virtuozzo but with the addition of Microsofts Hyper we`ve also been offering that to consumers. Let me make this clear that,this isn't any kind of self publicity. But its just an effort to put forth the actual scenario.
Windows users have been happy with Hyper V VPS's hence it is supposed to be appreciated alternative.

 

[directspace.net]

Ouch, tough choice but I would have to go with Virtuozzo for security.

 

[HL-Sean]

Virtuozzo if cost is not a factor, but Openvz with a secured control panel like veportal or fluidvm. I wouldnt use Hypervm again.

 

[cogentvps]

Virtuozzo here

 

[HostColor]

When it comes to a comparison between Virtuozzo and OpenVZ, there is no doubt that Virtuozzo is more matured software application. Unlike OpenVZ it has a very good container and VPS management interface. Of course Virtuozzo is expensive compared to OpenVZ, but anyone who wants to deploy OpenVZ will spend a lot in development.

 

[Nexpoint]

We use virtuozzo for all of our VPS hosting. If you plan on using a control panel such as parallels plesk on your VPS, you should definitely look in to virtuozzo because you get a big break on plesk license fees when used with virtuozzo

 

[Saurabh]

Virtuozzo is a more advanced technology than Hyper VM.It is more stable than HyperVM.
Yes if the choice would have been between Vituozzo and Hyper V, I would have voted for HyperV for sure.

 

[HL-Sean]

Openvz is cheaper and works fine, if you have the money you can go the other route.

 

[DrVPS]

Unless you are extremely experienced in Linux you need to have Virtuozzo

 

[Hosting India]

No doubt it is Virtuozzo 😀

 

[Matt - HostMist]

I've been rolling out Open VZ lately and have yet to try Virtuozzo mostly cause of the cost.

 

[memark]

Virtuozzo any time, though hyper-v server 2008 R2 claims to be giving Virtuozzo a run for their money

 

[Taba-Promos]

Virtuozzo is better, however OpenVz is free and is quite good.
So both has it's advantages and disadvantages.

 

[Point Red]

Yes, Virtuozzo is what we like.

 

[siforek]

I've been rolling out Open VZ lately and have yet to try Virtuozzo mostly cause of the cost.

You can "try" it for free 🙂

 

[hostatree]

I wouldnt go with hyperVM. its just too buggy.

 

[cyberq]

HyperVM is cheap for the first moment only. The addons for it costs too much. Use Xen or openVZ with a good panel.. Virtuozzo, ISPmanager, DA, etc.

 

[TNTWebHosting]

Virtuozzo is the prettier and more 'Professional' approach, however, costs alot.

HyperVM is free for 5 users, then its like 25¢ per server after that.

However, consider this. HyperVM actually develops features that Virtuozzo then uses later.

 

[-Jab-]

Virtuozzo go with it. HyperVM is now dead and full of security holes.