While Domain Authority (DA) shouldn't be the sole focus, it can be a useful benchmark when approached correctly. Here's what I've found works best:I wouldn't bother too much with it, the metric has a small correlation with ranking but it sort of a cause and effect relationship.
The one we realised with DA it if you send a ton of traffic to your site, it goes up, obviously other things like backlinks, brand name mentions also count towards it. But I've seen so many sites with high DA rank low and so many sites with low DA rank well. This is why, even if its not stated, I think traffic is a big influencer of it, and if you are working on DA purely for ranking purpose then the metric is not that useful because of this.
My guess here is because DA, DR is not that accurate the indicator of IT and other metrics like it, MOZ, Semrush use it because if you have high traffic you must be an high authority website right? So now it seems to you like oh wow yes they know what they are talking about and you buy into all the rest. Google uses some form of "DA" but again given what I've seen its very different from those provided by MOZ, Ahrefs, Semrush and all the rest.
Ironically the very fact that these guys want to tap into your analytics and search console to tell you about your traffic...should raise red flags. I mean I can look at analytics and search console the reason I want to use them is because I don't entirely trust what Google says and now they base their traffic on what Google says.
Brand Signals Matter More Than Ever - Google increasingly rewards real-world brand presence. Getting mentioned (without links) in press, forums, and social media appears to help both rankings and DA. <-- this part i think it super important right now with everything that's going on AI searches from chat gpt, Perplexity and Google. The one thing that's consistent is that Big brands rank well. Show up in AI. So you need to ask your self what separates a big brand from a small business online and replicate that.While Domain Authority (DA) shouldn't be the sole focus, it can be a useful benchmark when approached correctly. Here's what I've found works best:
Quality Backlinks Matter Most - A few links from authoritative, relevant sites (like .edu or industry leaders) do more than hundreds of spammy directory links. Outreach and genuine relationship-building are key.
Content That Earns Links Naturally - Create truly unique resources (studies, tools, or epic guides) that others WANT to reference. We saw a 15-point DA jump after publishing an original industry survey that got picked up by trade publications.
Technical SEO is the Foundation - All the backlinks in the world won't help if search engines can't properly crawl your site. Fixing crawl errors and improving site speed often provides quick wins.
Brand Signals Matter More Than Ever - Google increasingly rewards real-world brand presence. Getting mentioned (without links) in press, forums, and social media appears to help both rankings and DA.
That said, @PeterShene makes an excellent point - DA is just one metric. We've seen sites with DA 30 outrank DA 70 competitors because they focused on user experience and topical authority first. The number follows the quality, not the other way around.