This has to be my highlight of Website Ripping 2006: http://dedicatedbox.nl/
Drop me a PM I will resolve it. I have no intention to start a new venture until I have resolved these issues which was on the to do list, whilst I may have promised to refund you several times and sincerely apoligise.Sir!
230 euro isnt just a small ammount
Further more,
that design was provided by you to me, so I thank you for being so kind to point out that you have ripped it (although you could have said this to me when you sent the .zip for back then with ServerCarte), although I still have permission to use the design
Marks said:Drop me a PM I will resolve it. I have no intention to start a new venture until I have resolved these issues which was on the to do list, whilst I may have promised to refund you several times and sincerely apoligise.
Marks said:Yes I did send you the files, however I had the orginal files including the .fla and .psd files. However didn't expect it to be used in production when I gave it to you and sold the domains servercarte.com etc.. to you.
I believe it's the 4th now. However this game is annoying so I can understand your fustration and will refund you asap.Yeah you promised it about... well I think this is the 7th time, now?
Amusing by the way, that you do acknowledge that you actually received that email, but you never replied to it, and actually ignored all emails, even the friendly one's, sent to you.
Hehe, but the PM's on WHT and the posts in that topic were not lost in spam
Incorrect. They unplugged the servers because they claimed Paypal did 20 Server Reverse charges however when I rang Paypal they confirmed no charges were made. They wanted to fork out $2k (again) to reactivate the servers not to mention $25.00 reaction fee's for the 20 servers. [However, Lewis was offered the reaction fee waived but ignored it]Reason was, as far as I know, that DWH unplugged all them for non-payment, therefor, the clients were pretty screwed and lost their money,
I've spoken with some of the old employees of Managed.com including the ex owner (And it's minions) and they find it absolutly hillarious than anything else. I doubt WHP have the rights to the old design even though old pages like: http://www.managed.com/index5.htm still exist.I think it would be time to kiss and make up, and hope that Managed.com doesn't find out.
http://web.archive.org/web/20031118...com/company.htm
Marks said:Incorrect. They unplugged the servers because they claimed Paypal did 20 Server Reverse charges however when I rang Paypal they confirmed no charges were made. They wanted to fork out $2k (again) to reactivate the servers not to mention $25.00 reaction fee's for the 20 servers. [However, Lewis was offered the reaction fee waived but ignored it]
This wouldn't have been my problem if annouced a month before I was no longer the owner. The additional 100 Servers which were invoiced after was not my problem however Lewis failed to invoice customers and failed to pay DWH's invoices.
Here is the problem I see with this. You just said you spoke with old employees, and the ex owner. They cannot speak for managed.com as far as I can see, based on those statements.Marks said:I've spoken with some of the old employees of Managed.com including the ex owner (And it's minions) and they find it absolutly hillarious than anything else. I doubt WHP have the rights to the old design even though old pages like: http://www.managed.com/index5.htm still exist.
I actually think it might be interesting to hear managed.com's current owner's view on this thread.
I dont really care wether they agree or not,
Are you an idiot or your e-mail is set-up for the kindergarten?
I personally sent you 4 times the welcome letter with all server’s info next day after you signed up and you complained to PayPal the server wasn’t delivered?
CANCELED, moron
Their logo has been the same since 2001, and that can be proven. The design in question was their's since 2003, and they still use some of the design.CoreISP said:Their logo?
I made a new one, the original logo was something that looked like the core of a atom with Managed.com next to it, this is deffinatly not something similair.
Absolutely no need to be intentionally rude or disruptive.CoreISP said:I dont really care wether they agree or not