When should you host your own website?

winter07

New member
I found that there are many companies hosting their own website on their own servers, but I also found from a site said that people should not host they site on their own website on their home PC unless you want to learn how to do it. Does anyone know when people need to host their own website?:confused:
 
Hosting your site on your own server shows that you trust your servers. A host who doesnt shows people that even they do not trust the products they sell.
 
Hosting your site on your own server shows that you trust your servers. A host who doesnt shows people that even they do not trust the products they sell.

Sorry I think I didn't make myself clear. When companies want to host their website by themselves, they will need to install servers on their own computer. I want to know what is the advantages and disadvantages of doing this. The companies are not companies who produce servers. They are just normal companies.
 
Sorry I think I didn't make myself clear. When companies want to host their website by themselves, they will need to install servers on their own computer. I want to know what is the advantages and disadvantages of doing this. The companies are not companies who produce servers. They are just normal companies.

It is always recommended to host the website on the server placed in the datacenter. A datacenter has the facility of redundant power,bandwidth and dedicated staff to take care of the server management. Whereas if you host your website on your local PC, you are limited to use limited resources, plus the performance of your website would get majorly hampered as you might be having a single ISP line, which is not the case with the datacenters.
 
IMO you should always use a datacenter to house your equipment unless you have the resources of a large corp. The utility's alone (electric, cooling, bandwidth) will exceed the amount you would pay out to a datacenter in most cases.
 
In-house versus colocation?

With in-house infrastructure (compared to colocation) you’ll most likely need:

Physical space
o Rack
o Servers
o UPS
o Switch
o Router
o Diesel Fuel Generator
o Firewall Appliance
o Security Systems
o Demarcation​
IT Staff
o Certified
o Trustworthy
o Reliable
o Elevated reimbursement plus benefits
o Available 24/7/365​
Location
o Expandable connectivity available to your location (s).​
Climate control
o Sensor alarms for temperature, moisture, smoke, etc.​
Physical security
o Locked server room with assigned access privileges
o Bio-Metric Hand Scan entrance​
Network Monitoring
o Hardware/Software investment
o Email Alerts
o IT staff on call 24/7/365​
Colocation offers a very cost-effective means of housing a secure hosting environment. Physical space is freed in-house, plus capital asset expense is dramatically reduced.

In-house - Few businesses can afford dual diesel fuel backup generators and none have the ability to cross-connect to different vendors. Managing an IT staff layers substantial payroll expense and man-hours. Disaster recovery plans are typically DAT tape backups and are rarely compliant.

Climate controls depend over whether the cleaning lady left the door to your server room open. Often there is no door - simply open access to your most valued resource - your data. Companies who have lost data fail at an alarming rate.
Scalability is limited and monitoring is more often than not a user complaining he/she can’t get their email or surf the Internet or receive calls.

Colocation - offers

• BGP networks for maximum uptime and reliability
• Managed services
• Redundant power sources
o Power grids
o UPS
o Diesel fuel generators​
• Cross-connects
• Physical security
• Electronic security
• Network monitoring
• Alarm sensors
o Temperature
o Moisture
o Smoke
o Fire​
• Scalability
o Cabinet and rack space
o Bandwidth
o Managed services​
Colocation services can be quickly deployed (no wait time to provision new circuits) and are easily expanded.

Why collocate?

Assign a dollar and weight value to each of the above (+ and -), then compare the results of in-house versus colocation. The numbers will jump off the page!

Businesses are migrating to colocation because it simply makes good ‘business sense.’
 
If you're hosting your web server in-house, you'll need infrastructure and IT staff. Factor in TCO when considering whether to host your site interally or colocate.

Total cost of ownership (TCO) in Information Technology (IT) is the total cost of the staff and infrastructure to support your business. When crunching numbers to determine the TCO of your IT department and your site, and how that fits into your day to day operations, disaster recovery and business continuity plans, take that one step further to compare those numbers versus colocating your servers in a data center.

Let’s say your business earns $5 million in annual revenues, with very aggressive plans to grow to $6 million. That extra $1 million could be the result of realized growth opportunities and a reduction in expenditures / streamlining your operations.

Most small businesses of this size employ one or two technicians to manage their servers, desktops, laptops, switches, hubs, printers, phone systems, email, applications, backups, etc. Their annualized investment can easily exceed $300,000. Their business data needs to be communicated internally as well as externally, so the applications and hardware can’t be scaled back, although they may be optimized by upgrading to more efficient services.

This is the scenario thousands of small businesses find themselves in today - only with scaled back growth projections due to the credit crunch. So how could these companies lower their Total Cost of Ownership by colocating their servers in a data center?

What do data centers have that aren’t part of their existing department?

Servers colocated in a data center are normally secured in a cage or rack, with regulated power, dedicated connectivity, layered security and on-site support services 24×7x365. Data centers typically have alarms monitored for fire, smoke and moisture, and power is backed up by a UPS and diesel fuel generator - greatly diminishing any loss of mission critical data due to fire, theft, vandalism or loss of power.

Which makes more 'business sense?'
 
Not really, that depends on what kind of server you have.

If you're using a normal PC to host your website, then it's not recommended as a PC isn't built for web hosting but for personal use.
 
Some hosting companies use a third part for status sites, this way if there is an issue with their network this site will not be affected and they can still have notifications for their customers.

I don't recommend hosting on your own computer as it is not designed for the security needed for hosting. The web application is designed on personal computers so that you can host locally. I use this feature when im developing an application and dont want to post files back and forth to the hosting site.
 
I guess there is no time on when should you host your own website. Nowadays having your own website can be something very common in the industries.
 
I guess there is no time on when should you host your own website. Nowadays having your own website can be something very common in the industries.

I would say that is the must if you are looking to appear serious on the market :shaky:
 
Back
Top