I think it most serious cases, this will be up to the judge to decide.Most provider's contracts limit your damage to a percentage of their hosting fees - not the value of your data.
You can sue, but most likely they will have a well written TOS. Its also a waste of money hiring lawyers to handle your case, its very time consuming and expensive. I dont think its worth it on your part to sue the host.
You should always keep your own backup, thats the number one rule when it come down to hosting.
You'll want to pay close attention to TOS and AUP. If a site is shut down for abuse, then there's no fault on the host. If the host offers an SLA (Service Level Agreement) then you can usually get SOME sort of reimbursement, but usually only for hosting fees, not loss of revenue.
I don't know of any web host that has a TOS that allows you to sue them for potential money or data lost. Almost every TOS I've ever read states that users are responsible for their data and are responsible for making backups of said data. Hands-on is no exception to this. Depending on the incident we may refund up to 100% of that month's hosting fees, but it's a case by case basis.
You guys might be right, and there is no reason for me not to agree. But I am just dreaming on a much larger scale. For example, an ecommerce site like TigerDirect.com losing its data or going down for a couple of days due to provider's error. Are you saying that TigerDirect.com cannot take their provider to court and sue for damages if they pay them thousands of dollars to ensure website's security? Are you saying that whatever provider says in their terms is where their liability stops?
Hmmm.... this makes me want to research for some news stories or cases when I have some time. Just for competing spirit sake.
what type of back -ups should i consider?