I think there's a lot to be said for first impressions and the right mix of graphics on a website. What guidelines do you recommend?
It depends actually on the type of a website. Personally, I think images are more powerful than words especially for websites that are selling tangible products. For most websites, using impressive images could probably reduce the bounce rate of visitors.
I am a huge fan of clean, simple, minimal websites.
https://love-thirteen.com there's so much that was done on this site and speed impact should be minimal.
We've built some massive sites in the past (one with over 4 million products) and WordPress can stand up without an issue.
I love minimal sites, but from an SEO perspective, those are very hard to rank. We see many people wanting their site to look like Apple with very few words etc - but unless you have your own source for traffic and you're not relying on SEO, going too minimal is a death sentence.
Loading time is 5.58s and it uses CDN.. Perhaps I'm too demanding, setting myself 2.00s as red line.
Sorry, while accessing from US it's 3.5s - pretty good.
3.5 on a home page is about normal - when SEO is done right, people shouldn't be landing on the home page, they should be landing on an individual product, and depending on the tool used for checking speed, you'll get different results.
Magento is no different than WordPress, or BigCommerce, or Shopify or X-Cart or any number of Softwares. It's all about the hosting speed.
I'm not very proud of my personal attempts (not a web designer), but such impressive things can be achieved even with Elementor Still, as long as it is a part of WordPress, can't count myself as a fan :disagree: As for me - minimal sites require minimal platforms.
ReadyMag does a good job with this as well, although its angle is a little more creative than that. WordPress has some outstanding minimalist themes as well.
As for minimal platforms, what did you mean exactly?
It was about selecting the right CMS (or not selecting one), not about a specific framework behind it. For good result, good tools are needed. And the beauty of minimal site is then there are no unnecessary things left - both visually and coding wise. I know WordPress can do the job quite well and it does for the majority of site designers and owners, but in every separate scenario all available options should be leveraged, not just complete ease of use or overwhelming popularity because of, again, that ease of use.