Cybersquatting and You

ANMMark

New member
Recently (like yesterday), I have had the pleasure of being the target of Cybersquatting. Well, not me personally, but my company.

Since this issue is fresh in my mind, I thought I would share experience in general, as well share the law, what you can do if you're a victim of Cybersquatting, and what your rights are. I also want to share this, so that people who have it in their minds to do something like to a company, know exactly what they're getting themselves into.

What is Cybersquatting
Definitions of Cybersquatting vary from country to country, as to what Cybersquatting consists of. However, it boils down to extortion.

Cybersquatting is the term used to describe the practice of registering and claiming rights over Internet domain names which are, arguably, not for the taking. The cybersquatter then offers the domain to the rightful owner at an inflated price, an act which can be deemed to be extortion.

Our Experience
Over the past few days, as I stated, we were the target of this. Monday, we were asked in public, what our intent was in regards to the ongoing development of one of our products, IntelloChat. We confirmed the ongoing development, and that our customers will see the product sooner than they may expect. On the same day, a customer of one of our resellers decided to register the domain name IntelloChat.com, and then yesterday sent me a personal email stating that in light of our current development of the product, perhaps we would like to buy the domain from him for a fee of $50, and if we didn't, he would make it available to the public to buy.

Since this course of action is not only illegal, but potentially damaging to our business, we exercised our right to suspend this user's product license (which is covered in the EULA).

This person then decided to post about it in public, and privately threatened to sue us for loss of profit.

What is the UDRP?
The Uniform Dispute Resolution policy is a document which governs how domain name disputes will be resolved within the gTLD namespace. It defines the conditions under which a genuine dispute may arise, and provides guidelines for administrative proceedings to settle the issue, outside of a court where possible. All registrants registering domains through OpenSRS (or any other registrar) are bound by the UDRP
http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm

Under the UDRP Paragraph 4 (b)(i) it states:
(i) circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name;

The remedy for this is in Paragraph 4 (i)
i. Remedies. The remedies available to a complainant pursuant to any proceeding before an Administrative Panel shall be limited to requiring the cancellation of your domain name or the transfer of your domain name registration to the complainant.

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA)
This is in place to protect consumers and businesses with Federal law, against Cybersquatting. The stipulations follow the UDRP, and has additional remedies:

"The Act authorizes a court to order the forfeiture or cancellation of a domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. In lieu of actual damages, the plaintiff may elect statutory damages and the court has discretion to award damages of not less than $1,000 and not more than $100,000 per domain name, as the court considers just. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d)."

What can you if you are a target?
Immediately contact the domain registrar, where the domain was registered, or their upstream (or both), and immediately contact ICANN with the information you have pertaining to your case.

There is a good chance that the issue will be resolved quickly, without any court or legal proceedings.

However, keep in mind that legal proceedings are always a possibility in these cases. So you should prepare for it.

Don't just lay down and let some reem you with extortion. Fight for your business.
 
Just read the thread.... and suprise suprise where the complaint was located.
I admire how you are a fighter Mark. Good luck and hope you resolve it.... whether it's being "Being Intentionally Rude & Disruptive" or "Cybersquatting" ;)

Just curious howcome you didn't register the domain name to begin with when you annouced "IntelloChat" is in development
 
Marks said:
Just curious howcome you didn't register the domain name to begin with when you annouced "IntelloChat" is in development
In all honesty, our plans didn't include a domain or dedicated site for it. Now, we've been placed in a position of either buying it or having it put on the open market.
 
Great post, Mark.
The customer would think next time before playing along his greed. So what's the status of the domain now? Was the case resolved? Was the domain name cancelled?
 
It is indeed still be a faught battle.

We're in negotiations now however. Basically, what is on the table right now as resolution is:

1. He pushes the domain to us at no cost.

or

2. He signs a contract agreeing not to sell the domain, and to allow it to expire. And agrees that if he breeches the contract to be fined a legally bound specified amount.

Or

3. We simply contact our attorney at the end of the next business week, and sue for libel, cybersquatting, and damages. Cybersquatting alone carries a max of $100,000.
 
Maybe someone who isn't banned from WHT, could clear this claim up that was posted in that thread for Mark: "I also hear that the lead developer was banned from WHT. He says it was due to corrupt mods but I'm wondering if it's anything due to another complaint like this one, or possibly several?"

I need to talk to Troy about WHT since the Community Leaders don't bother to respond anymore, and the truth regarding the fiasco in April. Not because I want to be an active member again but to release the truth on what truly happened.
 
This is what was posted on WHT by user VT6:
It it very lucky I have Jason (2nd dev for AI) on MSN and was able to talk to him and finally reach an acceptable conclusion. I was literally a few clicks away from buying PerlDesk or Auracle.

I gave them the domain and they gave me my license back (despite Mark seeming reluctant to do this originally).

I should also point out, as I said this was a new idea of mine to sell domains and I have very little experience with this (this is the only one which is a brand name). I have somehow never seen that license agreement before, but have learned something from this - despite it costing me 1 customer, cash and a lot of grief.

This issue should be considered finished
 
He was simply trying to stir trouble onto a different topic, nothing more.

In my experience, people who don't want to take the blame, typically will try to push the reader in multiple directions, in an attempt to point the blame somewhere else.

A good example of this kind of writing is "The DaVinci Code". Dan Brown wrote the novel by pulling facts from many, non-related sources, and non-related topics, to prove a "Conspiracy theory" against Jesus, and the church, no less, in an attempt to topple the notion of Jesus' devinity. What came out of it, was a believable book, with facts that people can easily find themselves to be true. This is why there was such a stir over the book.

Did Mary have Christ's child? It's possible. Is Mary the actual Holy Grail? Also possible, and plausible. Did a sect actually remove Mary and Phillip's testements because it cast Mary as Jesus' spouse.....yes...fact.

His attempt in that thread was nothing more than the same type of fluff, to remove the breadcrumbs and to clutter the path with leaves, then direct you where to go.

update
The issue has been resolved. The domain was pushed to us, free of charge by the person in question.
 
ANMMark said:
update
The issue has been resolved. The domain was pushed to us, free of charge by the person in question.
I am glad to see it resolved in a positive way.
 
How did I miss this post ;)

I'm Nick H on WHT and if you read the thread there, I gave him a good ass kicking...until Alasdair (tickedon) closed it on me just as I was having some fun :(

Anywho--great job to you. I'm trialling IntelloDesk now and it looks good :thumbsup:
 
While I don't wish to rehash old issues. I do have to ask though, why is what James (VT6) did, not considered to be "Intentionally Rude or Disruptive"?

He started a thread at WHT with the sole intent of trashing us because his license was suspended, when in fact he had broke the law, and ICANN policy, and ultimately WHT rules, because he openly admitted to extortion against another WHT member.

I guess what I'm asking is, why was he not banned for this?
 
Last edited:
Because Administrators can't tell what's right and what's wrong anymore. Companies slander companies on WHT all the time which breaks the WHT rules yet The Community Leaders do nothing but watch the Post Counts of the forum go up each time.
 
Sorry this happenned to you but not surprising that it did. Same thing happened to us 3 years ago. One letter from our attorney took care of it but it did costs us $300 to fix it plus the domain name! :disagree:
 
I'm glad it was resolved. I think you both learned a hard lesson. If you ever have plans to develop a product and announce it to the public, grab the domain - it's $8, at least the .com anyways.

They were just trying to make a quick buck in their defence and you didn't bother to register it so I don't really blame them. This happens all the time. As soon as something comes up in the media about new movies, etc, the domains are gone - if you're not thinking ahead enough to get the domain yourself, first, you'll waste a lot of time and energy fighting for it down the road.. just a lousy $8 I'd rather register it and not worry.

My advice? Register first - announce second.
 
Well the thing is, like I said, we had no real use for the domain, and probably still will not use it.

The need arose purely from the fact of keeping it out of the hands of the public. Afterall, the guy threatened to sell it to the public if we didn't buy it, and who know's who may have purchased it. It could have been a competitor, or worse.

Had he have merely purchased the domain, we would have had no issue with that. The fact that he registered it in an attempt to make some money off of our hard work....that was aggravating.
 
Back
Top