Microsoft has firmly upheld its decision to require Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 2.0 for Windows 11, dismissing criticism from consumers and enterprises. While TPM enhances device security by encrypting data and safeguarding authentication processes, critics argue that the mandate excludes numerous capable devices from upgrading to the operating system.

Steven Hosking, Microsoft’s Senior Product Manager, directly defended the mandate. He described TPM 2.0 as “essential for a secure and future-proof Windows 11,” emphasizing that hardware-level security ensures protection against modern cyber threats. Despite this, Microsoft’s flexibility for Windows Server 2025 has baffled many. Unlike Windows 11, the server platform does not enforce TPM 2.0 as a strict requirement.

This dual approach has triggered questions about consistency. While TPM 2.0 supports features like BitLocker Drive Encryption, Windows Server 2025 continues to function without it. Many see this as an indication that the requirement for Windows 11 stems from rigid enforcement rather than practical necessity.

The requirement has significant consequences. A vast number of Windows 10 devices, which remain dominant in market share, cannot transition to Windows 11 solely because they lack TPM 2.0. Devices equipped with advanced specifications, such as high-end processors and SSDs, remain excluded, compelling enterprises and individuals to consider costly hardware upgrades.

Although newer PCs generally include TPM, powerful older machines remain incompatible. Hosking acknowledged the challenges organizations face while adapting to the mandate. However, his assurances failed to appease users frustrated by the financial and logistical hurdles of compliance.

Microsoft’s insistence on TPM 2.0 highlights its dedication to security, but the debate over balancing accessibility and protection persists. As users explore unofficial methods to bypass the requirement, the conversation surrounding compatibility and flexibility is far from settled.