WHICH IS BETTER "seeking opinions"

Status
Not open for further replies.

hostroyal.us

Account Disabled
zamfoo.com
or
whmplug.com

i'm not asking which website is better i mean which script/software is better
 
Last edited:
Check out WHMPHP.

Zamfoo has some serious security issues which you can find with a quick search on WHT.

WHMPlug, I've never heard of it but it doesn't look like they have launched yet. You can't order it, download it, most pages are not done etc etc
 
Zamfoo full of bugs along with an obnoxious and abusive owner.

WHMPHP is OK, but they promise features etc that never materialise.

WHMReseller is great although slow support, but then in the 10 years we have been using it only needed to contact them twice and that was because of a change of server and their system would not change the server IP when we tried. we paid $99 for a lifetime licence.

never heard of WHMPlug, and their contact page gives no contact links or details it seems the domain was registered in 2009 (Creation Date: 06-Dec-2009)and still their site is not complete and no demo available and it seems they have their whois details hidden, so what are they hiding
 
thanks alex you're so kind :D

**************

hostroyal, this is extremely rude.

easyhost's experiences are valid, as far as I can tell, he's been doing this a while and has a great deal of experience you could benefit from.

Rude replies like this could very well get you ignored by members when you most need answers.
They may even be seen by potential customers who might wonder if this is the treatment in store for them!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zamfoo.com
or
whmplug.com

i'm not asking which website is better i mean which script/software is better
I haven't used either but I feel duty obliged to inform you (like others have) that the zamfoo software is riddled with security vulnerabilities. Do Not Use it!
 
for once in a lifetime you are finally correct
this is a public forum anyone can comment


:box::box:

Have i insulted or abused anyone NO, have you insulted and abused me YES.

so why should i leave, others have vouched for my experience.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What he has said in other threads should have no bearing on what was said in this thread.
@easyhost media was simply giving you sound advice, now backed up by others.
It is you sir, that are being rude.
And despite this appalling behavior in public being highlighted you continue to disparage others, to the detriment of yourself.
If you must bring up the topic, easyhost media was merely informing you of the terms and condition under which you are allowed to resell WHMCS, which you appear to believe, and expect other to believe, without proof, doesn't apply to you.
But the way you react to having this highlighted isn't in the logical professional manor that you'd expect from a host, but that of a rude spoilt teenager.
You attempt to take the mickey out of easthostmedia's website, when your own is a mass of broken links and bad grammar.
No doubt you will be telling us next, that you didn't write the wording, but paid someone to do it?
Why don't you be the real man, and apologise to easyhostmedia for being so rude and let it drop, and if you can't, at least let bygones be bygones.
Everytime you are rude and attack someone in this way, it only serves to lose you potential customers.
Now if I've offended you in any way I apologise. I am not a moderator, but relative newbie on this forum, but I'm sure you are not doing yourself or this forum any favours behaving in this way.
 
Last edited:
My advise was from http://www.whmcs.com/resellers/, so you are saying WHMCS gives false info on their site regarding their own reseller program.

you have yet to prove anything what you say, but all you can do is abuse and insult people that give your Correct information.

you are aware WHMCS is a part of cPanel, so the owner of WHMCS could not issue licences to anyone without cPanel approval. licences are generated through their licencing server, so they could not give licences without the correct procedure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top