Website Builder

We only offering Installatron and Softaculus using which wide range of CMSs like Joomla, Magento, WordPress etc. can be installed.
 
I would say no, but how could you quantify this one way or the other? Website builders have their niche in this industry, and that's not going away.
 
SitePad and Site.Pro
The former can be used wit our static only hosting.
Either can be used with our standard shared hosting.
 
We provide Softaculous and instralltron application installer for the various CMS. WordPress, Joomla, OpenCart, Prestashop are most popular among them.
 
With CMS based websites being so popular, offering a script autoinstaller like softaculous gives the most value.

We do offer site.pro but its used rarely
 
We offer SitePad as it’s a very good website builder for our clients. It’s costs us only a few quid a month to license, and for clients it’s like having a weebly £20 Per Month Account type of deal.
 
We offer site.pro, fairly cheap and has nice features. I don't see too many difference between the site builder providers. Its a nice thing to use in advertising, to attract those new to web-hosting.
 
Many small companies only need a handful of pages on their website.

Site Builders build these pages as HTML code.

So for small sites, the site-builder has the following advantages.

1. The site needs no CPU to complete so it's unlikely your site will slow down.
2. Your site will be faster than dynamic pages
3. If you haven't used stupid FTP or C'Panel passwords, its unlikely you will ever get hacked.
4. You won't need to learn a CMS or spend any time updating all the scripts every week.
 
Site.Pro is nice but more expensive / the licensing is more limited.

SitePad is 'good enough' and has far more open licensing.
 
We offer a simple web builder service, most people seem to go to one of the bigger guys like square space if they want anything more than we offer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Supporters

Back
Top