CanSpace
Member
You know, it’s been years since we’ve all learned and accepted what all these “top 10 hosting companies” websites were about. Commercial enterprises standing to rip the highest affiliate commission, not benefit or educate a consumer. Fine. It’s a business model. I get it.
Then I started noticing these top lists posted in B-grade media: tech news sites, tech sections of magazines, etc., followed by more mainstream tech media like CNET or ZDNet. Then outlets like FORTUNE magazine started to run “10 Best Hosting Companies in 2022” kind of stories, with very little thought provided, promoting all the same companies.
But now it’s finally everywhere. I came across this article in Forbes this morning, titled "Best hosting services in Canada for August 2023."
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/ca/business/software/best-web-hosting-services/
Understandably the small print discloses that the “Forbes Advisor may earn a commission on sales made from partner links”. But this part would irk anyone with at least a bit of familiarity with either the hosting industry or journalistic ethics: “but that doesn't affect our editors' opinions or evaluations.”
The advisor then proceeds to list the best hosting companies for Canada with not a single one of them being headquartered in Canada, only one of them even running on .CA domain (with .COM being the main one), only one being CIRA certified, if I am not mistaken, and pretty much all of them priced in US currency (GoDaddy is the only one that at least gives the option to change displayed currency). Obviously, no verification of any kind was conducted, so when the author says “great support”, “best for wordpress” or “best for reliability” (meaning all others aren’t as reliable?), it doesn’t really mean anything.
Icing on the cake is Forbes listing an editor who did fact checking. What did the editor fact check exactly? If the affiliate links were copied correctly?
Just a disappointing reality that even top grade journalism is no longer journalism.
Then I started noticing these top lists posted in B-grade media: tech news sites, tech sections of magazines, etc., followed by more mainstream tech media like CNET or ZDNet. Then outlets like FORTUNE magazine started to run “10 Best Hosting Companies in 2022” kind of stories, with very little thought provided, promoting all the same companies.
But now it’s finally everywhere. I came across this article in Forbes this morning, titled "Best hosting services in Canada for August 2023."
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/ca/business/software/best-web-hosting-services/
Understandably the small print discloses that the “Forbes Advisor may earn a commission on sales made from partner links”. But this part would irk anyone with at least a bit of familiarity with either the hosting industry or journalistic ethics: “but that doesn't affect our editors' opinions or evaluations.”
The advisor then proceeds to list the best hosting companies for Canada with not a single one of them being headquartered in Canada, only one of them even running on .CA domain (with .COM being the main one), only one being CIRA certified, if I am not mistaken, and pretty much all of them priced in US currency (GoDaddy is the only one that at least gives the option to change displayed currency). Obviously, no verification of any kind was conducted, so when the author says “great support”, “best for wordpress” or “best for reliability” (meaning all others aren’t as reliable?), it doesn’t really mean anything.
Icing on the cake is Forbes listing an editor who did fact checking. What did the editor fact check exactly? If the affiliate links were copied correctly?
Just a disappointing reality that even top grade journalism is no longer journalism.